Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words: An eye-tracking investigation

Yu-Cin Jian, Ming Lei Chen, Hwa Wei Ko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated context effects of online processing of Chinese academic words during text reading. Undergraduate participants were asked to read Chinese texts that were familiar or unfamiliar (containing physics terminology) to them. Physics texts were selected first, and then we replaced the physics terminology with familiar words; other common words remained the same in both text versions. Our results indicate that readers experienced longer rereading times and total fixation durations for the same common words in the physics texts than for the corresponding texts. Shorter gaze durations were observed for the replaced words than the physics terminology; however, the duration of participants' first fixations on these two word types did not differ from each other. Furthermore, although the participants performed similar reading paths after encountering the target words of the physics terminology and replaced words, their processing duration of the current sentences was very different. They reread the physics terminology more times and spent more reading time on the current sentences containing the physics terminology, searching for more information to aid comprehension. This study showed that adult readers seemed to successfully access each Chinese character's meaning but initially failed to access the meaning of the physics terminology. This could be attributable to the nature of the formation of Chinese words; however, the use of contextual information to comprehend unfamiliar words is a universal phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-413
Number of pages11
JournalReading Research Quarterly
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Physics
physics
Terminology
technical language
Reading
Word Processing
comprehension

Keywords

  • Adolescent/young adult literature
  • Adult
  • Automaticity
  • Cognitive
  • College/university students
  • Comprehension
  • Comprehension monitoring
  • Content analyses
  • Content literacy
  • Context
  • Context clues
  • Decoding
  • Depth of (higher level literal level etc.)
  • Domain knowledge
  • Experimental, quasi-experimental
  • Eye movement
  • Fluency
  • General vocabulary
  • High-frequency words
  • Information processing
  • Informational text
  • Language learners
  • Learning strategies
  • Linguistics
  • Literary theory
  • Literature
  • Making inferences
  • Metacognitive strategies
  • Morphemic analysis
  • Morphology
  • Predicting
  • Prior knowledge
  • Psycholinguistic
  • Reading strategies
  • Research methodology
  • Scientific
  • Selecting
  • Sight words, word recognition
  • Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.)
  • Speed, rate
  • Strategies, methods, and materials
  • Text features, text structure
  • Text types, text features
  • Theoretical perspectives
  • To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?
  • Vocabulary
  • Word structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words : An eye-tracking investigation. / Jian, Yu-Cin; Chen, Ming Lei; Ko, Hwa Wei.

In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.01.2013, p. 403-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca953c07053949dbb9dad0faf055c2b0,
title = "Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words: An eye-tracking investigation",
abstract = "This study investigated context effects of online processing of Chinese academic words during text reading. Undergraduate participants were asked to read Chinese texts that were familiar or unfamiliar (containing physics terminology) to them. Physics texts were selected first, and then we replaced the physics terminology with familiar words; other common words remained the same in both text versions. Our results indicate that readers experienced longer rereading times and total fixation durations for the same common words in the physics texts than for the corresponding texts. Shorter gaze durations were observed for the replaced words than the physics terminology; however, the duration of participants' first fixations on these two word types did not differ from each other. Furthermore, although the participants performed similar reading paths after encountering the target words of the physics terminology and replaced words, their processing duration of the current sentences was very different. They reread the physics terminology more times and spent more reading time on the current sentences containing the physics terminology, searching for more information to aid comprehension. This study showed that adult readers seemed to successfully access each Chinese character's meaning but initially failed to access the meaning of the physics terminology. This could be attributable to the nature of the formation of Chinese words; however, the use of contextual information to comprehend unfamiliar words is a universal phenomenon.",
keywords = "Adolescent/young adult literature, Adult, Automaticity, Cognitive, College/university students, Comprehension, Comprehension monitoring, Content analyses, Content literacy, Context, Context clues, Decoding, Depth of (higher level literal level etc.), Domain knowledge, Experimental, quasi-experimental, Eye movement, Fluency, General vocabulary, High-frequency words, Information processing, Informational text, Language learners, Learning strategies, Linguistics, Literary theory, Literature, Making inferences, Metacognitive strategies, Morphemic analysis, Morphology, Predicting, Prior knowledge, Psycholinguistic, Reading strategies, Research methodology, Scientific, Selecting, Sight words, word recognition, Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.), Speed, rate, Strategies, methods, and materials, Text features, text structure, Text types, text features, Theoretical perspectives, To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?, Vocabulary, Word structure",
author = "Yu-Cin Jian and Chen, {Ming Lei} and Ko, {Hwa Wei}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/rrq.56",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "403--413",
journal = "Reading Research Quarterly",
issn = "0034-0553",
publisher = "International Reading Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words

T2 - An eye-tracking investigation

AU - Jian, Yu-Cin

AU - Chen, Ming Lei

AU - Ko, Hwa Wei

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - This study investigated context effects of online processing of Chinese academic words during text reading. Undergraduate participants were asked to read Chinese texts that were familiar or unfamiliar (containing physics terminology) to them. Physics texts were selected first, and then we replaced the physics terminology with familiar words; other common words remained the same in both text versions. Our results indicate that readers experienced longer rereading times and total fixation durations for the same common words in the physics texts than for the corresponding texts. Shorter gaze durations were observed for the replaced words than the physics terminology; however, the duration of participants' first fixations on these two word types did not differ from each other. Furthermore, although the participants performed similar reading paths after encountering the target words of the physics terminology and replaced words, their processing duration of the current sentences was very different. They reread the physics terminology more times and spent more reading time on the current sentences containing the physics terminology, searching for more information to aid comprehension. This study showed that adult readers seemed to successfully access each Chinese character's meaning but initially failed to access the meaning of the physics terminology. This could be attributable to the nature of the formation of Chinese words; however, the use of contextual information to comprehend unfamiliar words is a universal phenomenon.

AB - This study investigated context effects of online processing of Chinese academic words during text reading. Undergraduate participants were asked to read Chinese texts that were familiar or unfamiliar (containing physics terminology) to them. Physics texts were selected first, and then we replaced the physics terminology with familiar words; other common words remained the same in both text versions. Our results indicate that readers experienced longer rereading times and total fixation durations for the same common words in the physics texts than for the corresponding texts. Shorter gaze durations were observed for the replaced words than the physics terminology; however, the duration of participants' first fixations on these two word types did not differ from each other. Furthermore, although the participants performed similar reading paths after encountering the target words of the physics terminology and replaced words, their processing duration of the current sentences was very different. They reread the physics terminology more times and spent more reading time on the current sentences containing the physics terminology, searching for more information to aid comprehension. This study showed that adult readers seemed to successfully access each Chinese character's meaning but initially failed to access the meaning of the physics terminology. This could be attributable to the nature of the formation of Chinese words; however, the use of contextual information to comprehend unfamiliar words is a universal phenomenon.

KW - Adolescent/young adult literature

KW - Adult

KW - Automaticity

KW - Cognitive

KW - College/university students

KW - Comprehension

KW - Comprehension monitoring

KW - Content analyses

KW - Content literacy

KW - Context

KW - Context clues

KW - Decoding

KW - Depth of (higher level literal level etc.)

KW - Domain knowledge

KW - Experimental, quasi-experimental

KW - Eye movement

KW - Fluency

KW - General vocabulary

KW - High-frequency words

KW - Information processing

KW - Informational text

KW - Language learners

KW - Learning strategies

KW - Linguistics

KW - Literary theory

KW - Literature

KW - Making inferences

KW - Metacognitive strategies

KW - Morphemic analysis

KW - Morphology

KW - Predicting

KW - Prior knowledge

KW - Psycholinguistic

KW - Reading strategies

KW - Research methodology

KW - Scientific

KW - Selecting

KW - Sight words, word recognition

KW - Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.)

KW - Speed, rate

KW - Strategies, methods, and materials

KW - Text features, text structure

KW - Text types, text features

KW - Theoretical perspectives

KW - To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?

KW - Vocabulary

KW - Word structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893513152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893513152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rrq.56

DO - 10.1002/rrq.56

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893513152

VL - 48

SP - 403

EP - 413

JO - Reading Research Quarterly

JF - Reading Research Quarterly

SN - 0034-0553

IS - 4

ER -