Abstract
Utilizing the case7-based reminding theory in analogical reasoning, this research proposes that the evaluation of a brand extension can be improved by reminding consumers of a similar brand in the extension category. This effect is derived from a brand-to-brand similarity, in addition to the product-to-product and brand-to-product similarity identified in prior literature. Experiment 1 explores the idea that the effect of similar case reminders is most pronounced in moderately similar extensions than in highly similar or highly dissimilar extensions due to schema congruity. Experiments 2 and 3 distinguish the levels of similarity (i.e., product-to-product, brand-to-product, and brand-to-brand similarity) as a source of consumers' evaluations on a brand extension and further eliminate an alternative explanation of instantaneous learning in the advertisement setup of Experiment 1.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-113 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Psychology and Marketing |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 Jan |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Marketing