Comparison of taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction

Chun-Yen Chang, Song Ling Mao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined the comparative efficiency of inquiry-group instruction and traditional teaching methods on junior high school students' achievement and attitudes toward earth science in Taiwan. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design involving 16 intact classes was used. Treatment group students (n = 319) received an inquiry-group instruction; control group students (n = 293) received a traditional approach. Data collection instruments included the Earth Science Achievement Test and the Attitudes Toward Earth Science Inventory (S. L. Mao & C. Y. Chang, 1997). A multivariate analysis of covariance suggested that (a) students in the experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than did students in the control group and that (b) there were statistically significant differences in favor of the inquiry-group instruction on student attitudes toward the subject matter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-346
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Educational Research
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Taiwan
instruction
group instruction
science
Group
student
achievement test
teaching method
multivariate analysis
efficiency
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Comparison of taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. / Chang, Chun-Yen; Mao, Song Ling.

In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 92, No. 6, 01.01.1999, p. 340-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbf3cbae6efe45418ccb5f93fac2661c,
title = "Comparison of taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction",
abstract = "The authors examined the comparative efficiency of inquiry-group instruction and traditional teaching methods on junior high school students' achievement and attitudes toward earth science in Taiwan. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design involving 16 intact classes was used. Treatment group students (n = 319) received an inquiry-group instruction; control group students (n = 293) received a traditional approach. Data collection instruments included the Earth Science Achievement Test and the Attitudes Toward Earth Science Inventory (S. L. Mao & C. Y. Chang, 1997). A multivariate analysis of covariance suggested that (a) students in the experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than did students in the control group and that (b) there were statistically significant differences in favor of the inquiry-group instruction on student attitudes toward the subject matter.",
author = "Chun-Yen Chang and Mao, {Song Ling}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00220679909597617",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "340--346",
journal = "Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0022-0671",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction

AU - Chang, Chun-Yen

AU - Mao, Song Ling

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - The authors examined the comparative efficiency of inquiry-group instruction and traditional teaching methods on junior high school students' achievement and attitudes toward earth science in Taiwan. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design involving 16 intact classes was used. Treatment group students (n = 319) received an inquiry-group instruction; control group students (n = 293) received a traditional approach. Data collection instruments included the Earth Science Achievement Test and the Attitudes Toward Earth Science Inventory (S. L. Mao & C. Y. Chang, 1997). A multivariate analysis of covariance suggested that (a) students in the experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than did students in the control group and that (b) there were statistically significant differences in favor of the inquiry-group instruction on student attitudes toward the subject matter.

AB - The authors examined the comparative efficiency of inquiry-group instruction and traditional teaching methods on junior high school students' achievement and attitudes toward earth science in Taiwan. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design involving 16 intact classes was used. Treatment group students (n = 319) received an inquiry-group instruction; control group students (n = 293) received a traditional approach. Data collection instruments included the Earth Science Achievement Test and the Attitudes Toward Earth Science Inventory (S. L. Mao & C. Y. Chang, 1997). A multivariate analysis of covariance suggested that (a) students in the experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than did students in the control group and that (b) there were statistically significant differences in favor of the inquiry-group instruction on student attitudes toward the subject matter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007258345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007258345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00220679909597617

DO - 10.1080/00220679909597617

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007258345

VL - 92

SP - 340

EP - 346

JO - Journal of Educational Research

JF - Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0022-0671

IS - 6

ER -