Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs

Lu Jung Wang, Yi-xuan Hong, Jeen-Fong Li, Chin-Guo Kuo, Yeou-Feng Lue, Chin Hsien Cheng, Chien Hsun Wu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of this paper is to compare the performance of a passive and an active hydrogen fuel cell/battery electric vehicles under ECE-40 driving cycle. First, the subsystems of the active vehicle were modeled by low-order dynamics and performance maps. Subsystems include the battery, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), DC/DC converter, vehicle dynamics, traction motor, hydrogen storage system were modeled on the Matlab/Simulink platform. Next, a set of 9 fuzzy rules are designed for energy management. Two inputs are the residual hydrogen and demanded total power while the single output is the power ratio between the battery and fuel cells. Simulation results show that the vehicle simulator is able to evaluate the battery SOC, hydrogen consumption, motor and DC/DC converter efficiencies, fuel cell current and voltage, etc.. Comparing performance of active and passive type vehicles, though the SOC of the active type is 1.97% less than the passive type, the former saves 1.31g hydrogen consumption, where the total hydrogen energy was improved by 9.75%. The comparison of two types of real fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles will be conducted in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages509-514
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781479980697
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 1
Event2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC 2015 - Taipei, Taiwan
Duration: 2015 Apr 92015 Apr 11

Publication series

NameICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control

Other

Other2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC 2015
CountryTaiwan
CityTaipei
Period15/4/915/4/11

Fingerprint

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
fuel cells
electric batteries
Fuel cells
vehicles
membranes
protons
direct current
hydrogen
Hydrogen
DC-DC converters
converters
hydrogen fuels
Traction motors
traction
Hydrogen fuels
Energy management
Hydrogen storage
Hybrid vehicles
Fuzzy rules

Keywords

  • energy management
  • fuel cell
  • fuzzy control
  • hybrid powertrain
  • modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Instrumentation
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Wang, L. J., Hong, Y., Li, J-F., Kuo, C-G., Lue, Y-F., Cheng, C. H., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs. In ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (pp. 509-514). [7116089] (ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089

Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs. / Wang, Lu Jung; Hong, Yi-xuan; Li, Jeen-Fong; Kuo, Chin-Guo; Lue, Yeou-Feng; Cheng, Chin Hsien; Wu, Chien Hsun.

ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015. p. 509-514 7116089 (ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Wang, LJ, Hong, Y, Li, J-F, Kuo, C-G, Lue, Y-F, Cheng, CH & Wu, CH 2015, Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs. in ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control., 7116089, ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 509-514, 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC 2015, Taipei, Taiwan, 15/4/9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089
Wang LJ, Hong Y, Li J-F, Kuo C-G, Lue Y-F, Cheng CH et al. Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs. In ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2015. p. 509-514. 7116089. (ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089
Wang, Lu Jung ; Hong, Yi-xuan ; Li, Jeen-Fong ; Kuo, Chin-Guo ; Lue, Yeou-Feng ; Cheng, Chin Hsien ; Wu, Chien Hsun. / Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs. ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015. pp. 509-514 (ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control).
@inproceedings{1a7d536c96074a62976a45a5b89c6e2a,
title = "Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs",
abstract = "The concept of this paper is to compare the performance of a passive and an active hydrogen fuel cell/battery electric vehicles under ECE-40 driving cycle. First, the subsystems of the active vehicle were modeled by low-order dynamics and performance maps. Subsystems include the battery, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), DC/DC converter, vehicle dynamics, traction motor, hydrogen storage system were modeled on the Matlab/Simulink platform. Next, a set of 9 fuzzy rules are designed for energy management. Two inputs are the residual hydrogen and demanded total power while the single output is the power ratio between the battery and fuel cells. Simulation results show that the vehicle simulator is able to evaluate the battery SOC, hydrogen consumption, motor and DC/DC converter efficiencies, fuel cell current and voltage, etc.. Comparing performance of active and passive type vehicles, though the SOC of the active type is 1.97{\%} less than the passive type, the former saves 1.31g hydrogen consumption, where the total hydrogen energy was improved by 9.75{\%}. The comparison of two types of real fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles will be conducted in the future.",
keywords = "energy management, fuel cell, fuzzy control, hybrid powertrain, modeling",
author = "Wang, {Lu Jung} and Yi-xuan Hong and Jeen-Fong Li and Chin-Guo Kuo and Yeou-Feng Lue and Cheng, {Chin Hsien} and Wu, {Chien Hsun}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089",
language = "English",
series = "ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
pages = "509--514",
booktitle = "ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of passive and active types of proton exchange membrane fuel cell / battery HEVs

AU - Wang, Lu Jung

AU - Hong, Yi-xuan

AU - Li, Jeen-Fong

AU - Kuo, Chin-Guo

AU - Lue, Yeou-Feng

AU - Cheng, Chin Hsien

AU - Wu, Chien Hsun

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - The concept of this paper is to compare the performance of a passive and an active hydrogen fuel cell/battery electric vehicles under ECE-40 driving cycle. First, the subsystems of the active vehicle were modeled by low-order dynamics and performance maps. Subsystems include the battery, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), DC/DC converter, vehicle dynamics, traction motor, hydrogen storage system were modeled on the Matlab/Simulink platform. Next, a set of 9 fuzzy rules are designed for energy management. Two inputs are the residual hydrogen and demanded total power while the single output is the power ratio between the battery and fuel cells. Simulation results show that the vehicle simulator is able to evaluate the battery SOC, hydrogen consumption, motor and DC/DC converter efficiencies, fuel cell current and voltage, etc.. Comparing performance of active and passive type vehicles, though the SOC of the active type is 1.97% less than the passive type, the former saves 1.31g hydrogen consumption, where the total hydrogen energy was improved by 9.75%. The comparison of two types of real fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles will be conducted in the future.

AB - The concept of this paper is to compare the performance of a passive and an active hydrogen fuel cell/battery electric vehicles under ECE-40 driving cycle. First, the subsystems of the active vehicle were modeled by low-order dynamics and performance maps. Subsystems include the battery, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), DC/DC converter, vehicle dynamics, traction motor, hydrogen storage system were modeled on the Matlab/Simulink platform. Next, a set of 9 fuzzy rules are designed for energy management. Two inputs are the residual hydrogen and demanded total power while the single output is the power ratio between the battery and fuel cells. Simulation results show that the vehicle simulator is able to evaluate the battery SOC, hydrogen consumption, motor and DC/DC converter efficiencies, fuel cell current and voltage, etc.. Comparing performance of active and passive type vehicles, though the SOC of the active type is 1.97% less than the passive type, the former saves 1.31g hydrogen consumption, where the total hydrogen energy was improved by 9.75%. The comparison of two types of real fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicles will be conducted in the future.

KW - energy management

KW - fuel cell

KW - fuzzy control

KW - hybrid powertrain

KW - modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941213914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941213914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089

DO - 10.1109/ICNSC.2015.7116089

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84941213914

T3 - ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control

SP - 509

EP - 514

BT - ICNSC 2015 - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -