Comparing spousal agreement on perceived responsibility for household natural hazard preparedness to actual behavior

Li San Hung*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares husbands' and wives' views on the person in a couple who should be responsible for preparing for hurricane hazards; it also examines whether the varying levels of agreement reached by husbands and wives regarding this responsibility are associated with actual preparedness behaviors. An online survey targeting married, heterosexual couples living in Sarasota County, Florida, USA was sent out between March and May, 2015. Both the husbands and the wives were asked to fill out the survey. A total of 170 surveys were used for analysis. Results suggested that husbands and wives felt that they had shared responsibility for most of the 19 preparedness behaviors considered. However, a few stereotypically masculine preparedness behaviors were found to typically fall to husbands. Husbands' and wives' views of perceived responsibility were not statistically different, but husbands tended to favor individual responsibility, while wives tended to favor joint responsibility. Higher levels of agreement were significantly associated with greater engagement in planning-related preparedness behaviors. Policy implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0221217
JournalPloS one
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Aug 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing spousal agreement on perceived responsibility for household natural hazard preparedness to actual behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this