Comment on barckhausen et al., 2014 - evolution of the South China sea: Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading

Jih Hsin Chang, Tung-Yi Lee, Ho Han Hsu, Char Shine Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is ~15Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer stratigraphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen etal. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-678
Number of pages3
JournalMarine and Petroleum Geology
Volume59
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

seafloor spreading
China
radioactive age determination
expeditions
claystone
fossil assemblage
fossils
lava
lava flow
ridges
Miocene
fragments
rocks
rock
sea

Keywords

  • Ophiolite
  • Slow spreading
  • South China Sea

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Geophysics
  • Geology
  • Economic Geology
  • Stratigraphy

Cite this

Comment on barckhausen et al., 2014 - evolution of the South China sea : Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading. / Chang, Jih Hsin; Lee, Tung-Yi; Hsu, Ho Han; Liu, Char Shine.

In: Marine and Petroleum Geology, Vol. 59, 01.01.2015, p. 676-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{9b24a1bfd6ed4745bfec7f890e0c8b44,
title = "Comment on barckhausen et al., 2014 - evolution of the South China sea: Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading",
abstract = "We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is ~15Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer stratigraphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen etal. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea.",
keywords = "Ophiolite, Slow spreading, South China Sea",
author = "Chang, {Jih Hsin} and Tung-Yi Lee and Hsu, {Ho Han} and Liu, {Char Shine}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "676--678",
journal = "Marine and Petroleum Geology",
issn = "0264-8172",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on barckhausen et al., 2014 - evolution of the South China sea

T2 - Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading

AU - Chang, Jih Hsin

AU - Lee, Tung-Yi

AU - Hsu, Ho Han

AU - Liu, Char Shine

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is ~15Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer stratigraphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen etal. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea.

AB - We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is ~15Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer stratigraphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen etal. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea.

KW - Ophiolite

KW - Slow spreading

KW - South China Sea

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914140188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914140188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.003

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84914140188

VL - 59

SP - 676

EP - 678

JO - Marine and Petroleum Geology

JF - Marine and Petroleum Geology

SN - 0264-8172

ER -