College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making

Shiang Yao Liu, Chuan Shun Lin, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to test the nature of the assumption that there are relationships between scientific epistemological views (SEVs) and reasoning processes in socioscientific decision making. A mixed methodology that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches of data collection and analysis was adopted not only to verify the assumption but also to explore the patterns of interaction between the two constructs. A total of 177 college students (60% science and 40% non-science majors) completed a SEVs survey and a decision-making instrument. The decision-making instrument contains expository text introducing the environmental management issue of an invasive species, and a series of open-ended questions to elicit participants' reasons and judgments on the issue. Analyses revealed that tentativeness and creativity of SEVs are the significant components directly manifested in the socioscientific decision-making process. Students who held changing and tentative beliefs about scientific knowledge were more likely to recognize the complexity, take multiple perspectives, and question omniscient authority in the decision-making process. It was also found that over one-half of the college students, especially those who were science majors, make decisions based on a single disciplinary perspective. The findings suggest that educational programs should encourage students to actively participate in issue investigation and decision making by utilizing multiple reasoning modes and interdisciplinary thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-517
Number of pages21
JournalScience Education
Volume95
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 May 1

Fingerprint

decision making
decision-making process
student
environmental management
science
educational program
creativity
data analysis
Epistemological
Decision Making
College Students
methodology
interaction
knowledge
Decision-making Process
Authority
Environmental Management
Creativity
Methodology
Expository Text

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. / Liu, Shiang Yao; Lin, Chuan Shun; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: Science Education, Vol. 95, No. 3, 01.05.2011, p. 497-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f8042696e844b17b71f137c9f80dd63,
title = "College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making",
abstract = "This study aims to test the nature of the assumption that there are relationships between scientific epistemological views (SEVs) and reasoning processes in socioscientific decision making. A mixed methodology that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches of data collection and analysis was adopted not only to verify the assumption but also to explore the patterns of interaction between the two constructs. A total of 177 college students (60{\%} science and 40{\%} non-science majors) completed a SEVs survey and a decision-making instrument. The decision-making instrument contains expository text introducing the environmental management issue of an invasive species, and a series of open-ended questions to elicit participants' reasons and judgments on the issue. Analyses revealed that tentativeness and creativity of SEVs are the significant components directly manifested in the socioscientific decision-making process. Students who held changing and tentative beliefs about scientific knowledge were more likely to recognize the complexity, take multiple perspectives, and question omniscient authority in the decision-making process. It was also found that over one-half of the college students, especially those who were science majors, make decisions based on a single disciplinary perspective. The findings suggest that educational programs should encourage students to actively participate in issue investigation and decision making by utilizing multiple reasoning modes and interdisciplinary thinking.",
author = "Liu, {Shiang Yao} and Lin, {Chuan Shun} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sce.20422",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "497--517",
journal = "General Science Quarterly",
issn = "0097-0352",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - College students' scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making

AU - Liu, Shiang Yao

AU - Lin, Chuan Shun

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - This study aims to test the nature of the assumption that there are relationships between scientific epistemological views (SEVs) and reasoning processes in socioscientific decision making. A mixed methodology that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches of data collection and analysis was adopted not only to verify the assumption but also to explore the patterns of interaction between the two constructs. A total of 177 college students (60% science and 40% non-science majors) completed a SEVs survey and a decision-making instrument. The decision-making instrument contains expository text introducing the environmental management issue of an invasive species, and a series of open-ended questions to elicit participants' reasons and judgments on the issue. Analyses revealed that tentativeness and creativity of SEVs are the significant components directly manifested in the socioscientific decision-making process. Students who held changing and tentative beliefs about scientific knowledge were more likely to recognize the complexity, take multiple perspectives, and question omniscient authority in the decision-making process. It was also found that over one-half of the college students, especially those who were science majors, make decisions based on a single disciplinary perspective. The findings suggest that educational programs should encourage students to actively participate in issue investigation and decision making by utilizing multiple reasoning modes and interdisciplinary thinking.

AB - This study aims to test the nature of the assumption that there are relationships between scientific epistemological views (SEVs) and reasoning processes in socioscientific decision making. A mixed methodology that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches of data collection and analysis was adopted not only to verify the assumption but also to explore the patterns of interaction between the two constructs. A total of 177 college students (60% science and 40% non-science majors) completed a SEVs survey and a decision-making instrument. The decision-making instrument contains expository text introducing the environmental management issue of an invasive species, and a series of open-ended questions to elicit participants' reasons and judgments on the issue. Analyses revealed that tentativeness and creativity of SEVs are the significant components directly manifested in the socioscientific decision-making process. Students who held changing and tentative beliefs about scientific knowledge were more likely to recognize the complexity, take multiple perspectives, and question omniscient authority in the decision-making process. It was also found that over one-half of the college students, especially those who were science majors, make decisions based on a single disciplinary perspective. The findings suggest that educational programs should encourage students to actively participate in issue investigation and decision making by utilizing multiple reasoning modes and interdisciplinary thinking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953715639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953715639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.20422

DO - 10.1002/sce.20422

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 497

EP - 517

JO - General Science Quarterly

JF - General Science Quarterly

SN - 0097-0352

IS - 3

ER -