Collaborative academic–industry SCM research and knowledge building

Xiaohong Liu, Yen Chun Jim Wu, Mark Goh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This empirical study represents the first attempt to explore how academics and practitioners engage each other in the Supply Chain Management (SCM) discipline, and provides a better understanding of collaborative SCM research between both parties. A two-pronged approach, involving a content analysis and an e-mail survey, is employed to explore the issues on collaborative SCM research. We examine 131 articles co-authored by both scholars and practitioners of 6 SCM journals from 2003 to 2013. Specifically, we analyse the motivations, expectations, and communication involved in the process of collaborative research. Our findings suggest that academics and practitioners can partner as co-investigators in research collaboration to better explore an array of SCM phenomena embedded in SCM practice. Further, building collaborative SCM knowledge relationships expedites collaboration and benefits SCM knowledge learning, transfer, and co-production. The development of practice-based scientific SCM knowledge is useful for SCM theory building and serves to bridge the gap between rigour and relevance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-40
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 2

Fingerprint

Supply chain management
Management research
Knowledge building
Management knowledge

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • collaborative SCM research
  • Supply Chain Management
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Collaborative academic–industry SCM research and knowledge building. / Liu, Xiaohong; Wu, Yen Chun Jim; Goh, Mark.

In: International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 19-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17d5a874a4c8444e936185f3fcd80695,
title = "Collaborative academic–industry SCM research and knowledge building",
abstract = "This empirical study represents the first attempt to explore how academics and practitioners engage each other in the Supply Chain Management (SCM) discipline, and provides a better understanding of collaborative SCM research between both parties. A two-pronged approach, involving a content analysis and an e-mail survey, is employed to explore the issues on collaborative SCM research. We examine 131 articles co-authored by both scholars and practitioners of 6 SCM journals from 2003 to 2013. Specifically, we analyse the motivations, expectations, and communication involved in the process of collaborative research. Our findings suggest that academics and practitioners can partner as co-investigators in research collaboration to better explore an array of SCM phenomena embedded in SCM practice. Further, building collaborative SCM knowledge relationships expedites collaboration and benefits SCM knowledge learning, transfer, and co-production. The development of practice-based scientific SCM knowledge is useful for SCM theory building and serves to bridge the gap between rigour and relevance.",
keywords = "collaboration, collaborative SCM research, Supply Chain Management, survey",
author = "Xiaohong Liu and Wu, {Yen Chun Jim} and Mark Goh",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13675567.2015.1065801",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "19--40",
journal = "International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications",
issn = "1367-5567",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative academic–industry SCM research and knowledge building

AU - Liu, Xiaohong

AU - Wu, Yen Chun Jim

AU - Goh, Mark

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - This empirical study represents the first attempt to explore how academics and practitioners engage each other in the Supply Chain Management (SCM) discipline, and provides a better understanding of collaborative SCM research between both parties. A two-pronged approach, involving a content analysis and an e-mail survey, is employed to explore the issues on collaborative SCM research. We examine 131 articles co-authored by both scholars and practitioners of 6 SCM journals from 2003 to 2013. Specifically, we analyse the motivations, expectations, and communication involved in the process of collaborative research. Our findings suggest that academics and practitioners can partner as co-investigators in research collaboration to better explore an array of SCM phenomena embedded in SCM practice. Further, building collaborative SCM knowledge relationships expedites collaboration and benefits SCM knowledge learning, transfer, and co-production. The development of practice-based scientific SCM knowledge is useful for SCM theory building and serves to bridge the gap between rigour and relevance.

AB - This empirical study represents the first attempt to explore how academics and practitioners engage each other in the Supply Chain Management (SCM) discipline, and provides a better understanding of collaborative SCM research between both parties. A two-pronged approach, involving a content analysis and an e-mail survey, is employed to explore the issues on collaborative SCM research. We examine 131 articles co-authored by both scholars and practitioners of 6 SCM journals from 2003 to 2013. Specifically, we analyse the motivations, expectations, and communication involved in the process of collaborative research. Our findings suggest that academics and practitioners can partner as co-investigators in research collaboration to better explore an array of SCM phenomena embedded in SCM practice. Further, building collaborative SCM knowledge relationships expedites collaboration and benefits SCM knowledge learning, transfer, and co-production. The development of practice-based scientific SCM knowledge is useful for SCM theory building and serves to bridge the gap between rigour and relevance.

KW - collaboration

KW - collaborative SCM research

KW - Supply Chain Management

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966671733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966671733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13675567.2015.1065801

DO - 10.1080/13675567.2015.1065801

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84966671733

VL - 19

SP - 19

EP - 40

JO - International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications

JF - International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications

SN - 1367-5567

IS - 1

ER -