Abstract
Concern has risen that current global warming and more frequent extreme events such as droughts and floods will increase conflict around the world. This concern has spurred both social science research on contemporary climate, peace, and conflict as well as research in the historical sciences on past climate, weather, warfare, and violence. This perspectives article compares these two fields of scholarship and examines how each may benefit the other. It finds significant convergences in methods and insights across contemporary and historical research as well as persistent patterns in causal pathways between climate and conflict. Contemporary climate, peace, and conflict (CPC) research may sharpen methods and causal models for historical researchers. Historical studies, particularly those informed by contemporary research, may elucidate deep origins and long-term effects of climate-related conflicts. For policymakers and the public, history offers comprehensible ways to make sense of complex and contingent linkages and to construct cogent narratives of the past as well as storylines for the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e518 |
| Pages (from-to) | 774-792 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Ambio |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 May |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Archaeology
- Climate change
- Conflict
- History
- Peace
- Science communication
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Environmental Chemistry
- Ecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Climate, peace, and conflict—past and present: Bridging insights from historical sciences and contemporary research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS