Abstract
Objective: Stigma among healthcare professionals may lead to poor quality of healthcare services for patients with mental illness. This study conducts a network meta-analysis to estimate the relative efficacy between different types of anti-stigma interventions for healthcare professionals. Design: Network meta-analysis. Main Outcome Measures: The attitudes and behavior intension of healthcare professionals toward mental illness. Results: A total of 18 studies (22 trials) from 9 countries are included in the analysis. In the network meta-analysis, rank probabilities show interventions with indirect contact plus lecture (SUCRA = 81.5%), direct contact plus problem-based learning workshop (SUCRA = 77.4%), and indirect contact (SUCRA = 72.2%) having the highest probability of being ranked first, second, and third, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that education combining social contact is the most effective anti-stigma intervention, which can be implemented in clinical practices to help reduce this stigma and improve healthcare services for patients with mental illness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 669-684 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Psychology and Health |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Mental illness stigma
- medical education
- mental health
- systematic reviews
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenging mental illness stigma in healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review and network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS