Beyond Curve Fitting to Inferences about Learning

Yeou-Teh Liu, Gottfried Mayer-Kress, Karl M. Newell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this commentary, the authors elaborate on the issue of going beyond curve fitting to the drawing of inferences about motor learning. They argue that the agenda of A. Heathcote and S. Brown (2004) is largely a theory-free, curve-fitting enterprise that can be useful for certain aspects of describing behavior change, but that its gold standard of percentage of variance accounted for can also be misleading in its relevance to the theory of learning. Clearly, analysis methods are necessary and some are better than others, but the researcher can more fully exploit the relevance of methods to the construct with a priori theorizing than with a data-driven strategy of maximizing percentage of variance accounted for in curve fitting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-238
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Learning
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Dynamic systems
  • Learning curve
  • Motor learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Beyond Curve Fitting to Inferences about Learning. / Liu, Yeou-Teh; Mayer-Kress, Gottfried; Newell, Karl M.

In: Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.06.2004, p. 233-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Liu, Yeou-Teh ; Mayer-Kress, Gottfried ; Newell, Karl M. / Beyond Curve Fitting to Inferences about Learning. In: Journal of Motor Behavior. 2004 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 233-238.
@article{25f93b442ff24e15852927cf9f482f96,
title = "Beyond Curve Fitting to Inferences about Learning",
abstract = "In this commentary, the authors elaborate on the issue of going beyond curve fitting to the drawing of inferences about motor learning. They argue that the agenda of A. Heathcote and S. Brown (2004) is largely a theory-free, curve-fitting enterprise that can be useful for certain aspects of describing behavior change, but that its gold standard of percentage of variance accounted for can also be misleading in its relevance to the theory of learning. Clearly, analysis methods are necessary and some are better than others, but the researcher can more fully exploit the relevance of methods to the construct with a priori theorizing than with a data-driven strategy of maximizing percentage of variance accounted for in curve fitting.",
keywords = "Dynamic systems, Learning curve, Motor learning",
author = "Yeou-Teh Liu and Gottfried Mayer-Kress and Newell, {Karl M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3200/JMBR.36.2.233-238",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "233--238",
journal = "Journal of Motor Behavior",
issn = "0022-2895",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Curve Fitting to Inferences about Learning

AU - Liu, Yeou-Teh

AU - Mayer-Kress, Gottfried

AU - Newell, Karl M.

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - In this commentary, the authors elaborate on the issue of going beyond curve fitting to the drawing of inferences about motor learning. They argue that the agenda of A. Heathcote and S. Brown (2004) is largely a theory-free, curve-fitting enterprise that can be useful for certain aspects of describing behavior change, but that its gold standard of percentage of variance accounted for can also be misleading in its relevance to the theory of learning. Clearly, analysis methods are necessary and some are better than others, but the researcher can more fully exploit the relevance of methods to the construct with a priori theorizing than with a data-driven strategy of maximizing percentage of variance accounted for in curve fitting.

AB - In this commentary, the authors elaborate on the issue of going beyond curve fitting to the drawing of inferences about motor learning. They argue that the agenda of A. Heathcote and S. Brown (2004) is largely a theory-free, curve-fitting enterprise that can be useful for certain aspects of describing behavior change, but that its gold standard of percentage of variance accounted for can also be misleading in its relevance to the theory of learning. Clearly, analysis methods are necessary and some are better than others, but the researcher can more fully exploit the relevance of methods to the construct with a priori theorizing than with a data-driven strategy of maximizing percentage of variance accounted for in curve fitting.

KW - Dynamic systems

KW - Learning curve

KW - Motor learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342446601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342446601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.233-238

DO - 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.233-238

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:2342446601

VL - 36

SP - 233

EP - 238

JO - Journal of Motor Behavior

JF - Journal of Motor Behavior

SN - 0022-2895

IS - 2

ER -