TY - JOUR
T1 - Belief in neuromyths among primary school teachers
T2 - A cross-national study of 11 countries
AU - Adiguzel, Oktay Cem
AU - Potvin, Patrice
AU - Sarrasin, Jérémie Blanchette
AU - Vanhoolandt, Cédric
AU - Corfdir, Anaïs
AU - Japashov, Nursultan
AU - Mansurova, Aizhan
AU - Tsai, Chin Chung
AU - Wu, Ching Lin
AU - Elmas, Ridvan
AU - Atik-Kara, Derya
AU - Kucukkayhan, Sibel
AU - Zaid, Abdel Karim
AU - Kouchou, Ihsane
AU - Voulgari, Alexandra
AU - Sy, Ousmane
AU - Sakho, Ibrahima
AU - Ng, Soo Boon
AU - Charland, Patrick
AU - Létourneau, Angélique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier GmbH
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Background: This study compares primary school teachers' beliefs in neuromyths related to brain function and learning across different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two main research questions are explored and analyzed: “Which neuromyths are believed by primary school teachers?” And “What are the formal and informal sources of these neuromyths among primary school teachers?” Methods: Data were collected from 1257 primary school teachers in 11 countries using the Multilingual Neuromyths Identification Questionnaire, available in eight languages. The descriptive survey design explored the prevalence of neuromyths and the sources that shape teachers' understanding of learning and intelligence. Results: The findings indicate that 13 out of 21 neuromyths are prevalent in all of the countries that were surveyed. Notably, over 90 % of participants agreed with the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles. These misconceptions are primarily acquired through formal sources, such as teacher training programmes and professional seminars, as well as through professional experience and personal intuition. In contrast, informal sources, such as the media and popular culture, appear to play a minor role in developing these beliefs. Conclusions: The persistence of neuromyths among teachers underscores a critical need for evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology content in teacher education. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology into teacher education programs. The widespread belief in neuromyths highlights serious gaps in current educational policy and practice. To address this, coordinated national and international strategies are needed to inform ministries of education and policy makers about the prevalence and impact of these misconceptions.
AB - Background: This study compares primary school teachers' beliefs in neuromyths related to brain function and learning across different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two main research questions are explored and analyzed: “Which neuromyths are believed by primary school teachers?” And “What are the formal and informal sources of these neuromyths among primary school teachers?” Methods: Data were collected from 1257 primary school teachers in 11 countries using the Multilingual Neuromyths Identification Questionnaire, available in eight languages. The descriptive survey design explored the prevalence of neuromyths and the sources that shape teachers' understanding of learning and intelligence. Results: The findings indicate that 13 out of 21 neuromyths are prevalent in all of the countries that were surveyed. Notably, over 90 % of participants agreed with the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles. These misconceptions are primarily acquired through formal sources, such as teacher training programmes and professional seminars, as well as through professional experience and personal intuition. In contrast, informal sources, such as the media and popular culture, appear to play a minor role in developing these beliefs. Conclusions: The persistence of neuromyths among teachers underscores a critical need for evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology content in teacher education. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology into teacher education programs. The widespread belief in neuromyths highlights serious gaps in current educational policy and practice. To address this, coordinated national and international strategies are needed to inform ministries of education and policy makers about the prevalence and impact of these misconceptions.
KW - Formal learning sources
KW - Informal learning sources
KW - International comparison
KW - Neuromyths
KW - Primary teacher training
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011495839
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011495839#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.tine.2025.100264
DO - 10.1016/j.tine.2025.100264
M3 - Article
C2 - 40889831
AN - SCOPUS:105011495839
SN - 2211-9493
VL - 40
JO - Trends in Neuroscience and Education
JF - Trends in Neuroscience and Education
M1 - 100264
ER -