Author publication preferences and journal competition

Ji Lung Hsieh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The processes that authors use to publish their papers in journals can be analyzed in terms of field-specific practices. How they select targeted publications can influence competitive relationships among journals. In this paper, the author quantifies the publishing choices of a set of scholars to confirm this ecological perspective. The results indicate a strong focus on a small number of journals. A measure of author publishing choices was used to define four ecological characteristics: coverage, coreness, exclusivity, and journal overlap. Several types of journals indexed in the Information Science and Library Science section of the Journal Citation Reports are compared in terms of their ecological characteristics. The data show that some journals cover large numbers of authors, but compete with other journals in subcommunities. Some journals with author profiles similar to those of high-ranking journals lost potential submissions. Others with low coverage, high coreness, and high exclusivity were found to have groups of “fans” who used them for all of their submissions, but still exhibited a strong need to sustain their exclusivity. It is hoped that the method and results presented in this paper will provide useful information for editorial boards interested in managing their submissions according to author profiles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-377
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 1

Fingerprint

coverage
Information science
fan
information science
Fans
ranking
science
Group
Exclusivity
Editorial boards
Journal ranking
Citations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Author publication preferences and journal competition. / Hsieh, Ji Lung.

In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 365-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{337200936d854828aa42258da06b9360,
title = "Author publication preferences and journal competition",
abstract = "The processes that authors use to publish their papers in journals can be analyzed in terms of field-specific practices. How they select targeted publications can influence competitive relationships among journals. In this paper, the author quantifies the publishing choices of a set of scholars to confirm this ecological perspective. The results indicate a strong focus on a small number of journals. A measure of author publishing choices was used to define four ecological characteristics: coverage, coreness, exclusivity, and journal overlap. Several types of journals indexed in the Information Science and Library Science section of the Journal Citation Reports are compared in terms of their ecological characteristics. The data show that some journals cover large numbers of authors, but compete with other journals in subcommunities. Some journals with author profiles similar to those of high-ranking journals lost potential submissions. Others with low coverage, high coreness, and high exclusivity were found to have groups of “fans” who used them for all of their submissions, but still exhibited a strong need to sustain their exclusivity. It is hoped that the method and results presented in this paper will provide useful information for editorial boards interested in managing their submissions according to author profiles.",
author = "Hsieh, {Ji Lung}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/asi.23657",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "365--377",
journal = "Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology",
issn = "2330-1635",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author publication preferences and journal competition

AU - Hsieh, Ji Lung

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - The processes that authors use to publish their papers in journals can be analyzed in terms of field-specific practices. How they select targeted publications can influence competitive relationships among journals. In this paper, the author quantifies the publishing choices of a set of scholars to confirm this ecological perspective. The results indicate a strong focus on a small number of journals. A measure of author publishing choices was used to define four ecological characteristics: coverage, coreness, exclusivity, and journal overlap. Several types of journals indexed in the Information Science and Library Science section of the Journal Citation Reports are compared in terms of their ecological characteristics. The data show that some journals cover large numbers of authors, but compete with other journals in subcommunities. Some journals with author profiles similar to those of high-ranking journals lost potential submissions. Others with low coverage, high coreness, and high exclusivity were found to have groups of “fans” who used them for all of their submissions, but still exhibited a strong need to sustain their exclusivity. It is hoped that the method and results presented in this paper will provide useful information for editorial boards interested in managing their submissions according to author profiles.

AB - The processes that authors use to publish their papers in journals can be analyzed in terms of field-specific practices. How they select targeted publications can influence competitive relationships among journals. In this paper, the author quantifies the publishing choices of a set of scholars to confirm this ecological perspective. The results indicate a strong focus on a small number of journals. A measure of author publishing choices was used to define four ecological characteristics: coverage, coreness, exclusivity, and journal overlap. Several types of journals indexed in the Information Science and Library Science section of the Journal Citation Reports are compared in terms of their ecological characteristics. The data show that some journals cover large numbers of authors, but compete with other journals in subcommunities. Some journals with author profiles similar to those of high-ranking journals lost potential submissions. Others with low coverage, high coreness, and high exclusivity were found to have groups of “fans” who used them for all of their submissions, but still exhibited a strong need to sustain their exclusivity. It is hoped that the method and results presented in this paper will provide useful information for editorial boards interested in managing their submissions according to author profiles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962724787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962724787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/asi.23657

DO - 10.1002/asi.23657

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 365

EP - 377

JO - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

JF - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

SN - 2330-1635

IS - 2

ER -