Asymmetrical Resource Ownership Increases Owners' and Reduces Non-Owners' Motivation to Fight in the Mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus

Wei Lin Huang, Yu-Ying Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Resource ownership often increases an individual's aggressiveness and its probability of defeating a competitor. Individuals contesting resource owners could therefore incur higher costs, making individuals reluctant to compete with owners. We tested the hypothesis that animals use asymmetry in resource ownership as a cue for contest costs and adjust contest decisions accordingly. Using a mangrove rivulus fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus), we staged (1) contests with a randomly assigned asymmetry in resource ownership (one fish was provided with a shelter) and (2) contests in which neither fish had a shelter. Owners that were in their shelters at the contest start showed a greater tendency to fight and won more contests than their intruder opponents; those outside the shelter at the start did not. Compared with fish in contests with no shelters at stake, shelter owners had a higher tendency to fight whether or not they were in their shelters at the start; intruders, however, had a lower tendency to fight only against owners that were inside the shelter at the start. These results demonstrate (1) that ownership status influences both owners' and intruders' contest decisions (and in opposite directions), producing a detectable ownership advantage and (2) that intruders required confirmation of their opponents' ownership status before retreating without challenging them. Ownership status per se is therefore important to the fish's contest decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)915-921
Number of pages7
JournalEthology
Volume121
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 1

Fingerprint

ownership
shelter
mangrove
resource
fish
asymmetry
Kryptolebias marmoratus
aggression
cost
animal
animals
decision

Keywords

  • Animal contest
  • Fighting ability
  • Kryptolebias marmoratus
  • Ownership status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Asymmetrical Resource Ownership Increases Owners' and Reduces Non-Owners' Motivation to Fight in the Mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus. / Huang, Wei Lin; Hsu, Yu-Ying.

In: Ethology, Vol. 121, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 915-921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbd8043167b24ca6a86b309b8efd81e7,
title = "Asymmetrical Resource Ownership Increases Owners' and Reduces Non-Owners' Motivation to Fight in the Mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus",
abstract = "Resource ownership often increases an individual's aggressiveness and its probability of defeating a competitor. Individuals contesting resource owners could therefore incur higher costs, making individuals reluctant to compete with owners. We tested the hypothesis that animals use asymmetry in resource ownership as a cue for contest costs and adjust contest decisions accordingly. Using a mangrove rivulus fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus), we staged (1) contests with a randomly assigned asymmetry in resource ownership (one fish was provided with a shelter) and (2) contests in which neither fish had a shelter. Owners that were in their shelters at the contest start showed a greater tendency to fight and won more contests than their intruder opponents; those outside the shelter at the start did not. Compared with fish in contests with no shelters at stake, shelter owners had a higher tendency to fight whether or not they were in their shelters at the start; intruders, however, had a lower tendency to fight only against owners that were inside the shelter at the start. These results demonstrate (1) that ownership status influences both owners' and intruders' contest decisions (and in opposite directions), producing a detectable ownership advantage and (2) that intruders required confirmation of their opponents' ownership status before retreating without challenging them. Ownership status per se is therefore important to the fish's contest decisions.",
keywords = "Animal contest, Fighting ability, Kryptolebias marmoratus, Ownership status",
author = "Huang, {Wei Lin} and Yu-Ying Hsu",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/eth.12404",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "915--921",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asymmetrical Resource Ownership Increases Owners' and Reduces Non-Owners' Motivation to Fight in the Mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus

AU - Huang, Wei Lin

AU - Hsu, Yu-Ying

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Resource ownership often increases an individual's aggressiveness and its probability of defeating a competitor. Individuals contesting resource owners could therefore incur higher costs, making individuals reluctant to compete with owners. We tested the hypothesis that animals use asymmetry in resource ownership as a cue for contest costs and adjust contest decisions accordingly. Using a mangrove rivulus fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus), we staged (1) contests with a randomly assigned asymmetry in resource ownership (one fish was provided with a shelter) and (2) contests in which neither fish had a shelter. Owners that were in their shelters at the contest start showed a greater tendency to fight and won more contests than their intruder opponents; those outside the shelter at the start did not. Compared with fish in contests with no shelters at stake, shelter owners had a higher tendency to fight whether or not they were in their shelters at the start; intruders, however, had a lower tendency to fight only against owners that were inside the shelter at the start. These results demonstrate (1) that ownership status influences both owners' and intruders' contest decisions (and in opposite directions), producing a detectable ownership advantage and (2) that intruders required confirmation of their opponents' ownership status before retreating without challenging them. Ownership status per se is therefore important to the fish's contest decisions.

AB - Resource ownership often increases an individual's aggressiveness and its probability of defeating a competitor. Individuals contesting resource owners could therefore incur higher costs, making individuals reluctant to compete with owners. We tested the hypothesis that animals use asymmetry in resource ownership as a cue for contest costs and adjust contest decisions accordingly. Using a mangrove rivulus fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus), we staged (1) contests with a randomly assigned asymmetry in resource ownership (one fish was provided with a shelter) and (2) contests in which neither fish had a shelter. Owners that were in their shelters at the contest start showed a greater tendency to fight and won more contests than their intruder opponents; those outside the shelter at the start did not. Compared with fish in contests with no shelters at stake, shelter owners had a higher tendency to fight whether or not they were in their shelters at the start; intruders, however, had a lower tendency to fight only against owners that were inside the shelter at the start. These results demonstrate (1) that ownership status influences both owners' and intruders' contest decisions (and in opposite directions), producing a detectable ownership advantage and (2) that intruders required confirmation of their opponents' ownership status before retreating without challenging them. Ownership status per se is therefore important to the fish's contest decisions.

KW - Animal contest

KW - Fighting ability

KW - Kryptolebias marmoratus

KW - Ownership status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938738822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938738822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/eth.12404

DO - 10.1111/eth.12404

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938738822

VL - 121

SP - 915

EP - 921

JO - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 9

ER -