Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?

Hsiu Ping Yueh, Chi Cheng Chang, Chaoyun Liang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-90
Number of pages12
JournalThinking Skills and Creativity
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Dec 1

Fingerprint

engineering
science
performance
self-efficacy
Group
imagination
creativity
cognition
education
student

Keywords

  • Academic performance
  • Engineering education
  • Imagination
  • Science education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model? / Yueh, Hsiu Ping; Chang, Chi Cheng; Liang, Chaoyun.

In: Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 10, 01.12.2013, p. 79-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25eeb611a92e437baded9bf91649f5ec,
title = "Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?",
abstract = "The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.",
keywords = "Academic performance, Engineering education, Imagination, Science education",
author = "Yueh, {Hsiu Ping} and Chang, {Chi Cheng} and Chaoyun Liang",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "79--90",
journal = "Thinking Skills and Creativity",
issn = "1871-1871",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?

AU - Yueh, Hsiu Ping

AU - Chang, Chi Cheng

AU - Liang, Chaoyun

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.

AB - The current study is aimed at analyzing how selected personal and contextual factors influence academic performance through their impact on imagination, and comparing differences between the imagination-mediated model of science majors and that of engineering majors. The participants were a sample of 876 undergrads which were divided into science and engineering groups. An analysis of structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. The results showed that the initiating imagination of the science group had a negative and direct effect on their academic performance, whereas the conceiving imagination of the science group had a positive and direct effect. The transforming imagination indirectly influenced academic performance. Through the mediator effect of imagination, self-efficacy, generative cognition and conscientiousness had strong effects on the academic performance of both science and engineering majors. The results also indicated that the imagination-mediated models of both science and engineering groups were similar, but each variable had different influences. The major differences between these two models were the effects resulting from initiating imagination, conceiving imagination, self-efficacy, and conscientiousness on students' academic performance. The results will be appreciated and the instructional strategies will be developed under the premise that imagination and creativity are valuable to science and engineering education.

KW - Academic performance

KW - Engineering education

KW - Imagination

KW - Science education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886285451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886285451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84886285451

VL - 10

SP - 79

EP - 90

JO - Thinking Skills and Creativity

JF - Thinking Skills and Creativity

SN - 1871-1871

ER -