ARE TAIWANESE AND SINGAPOREAN FUTURE TEACHERS SIMILAR IN THEIR MATHEMATICS-RELATED TEACHING COMPETENCIES?

Feng-Jui Hsieh, Khoon Yoong Wong, Ting Ying Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the similarities and differences of mathematics-related teaching competencies between the future secondary school teachers of Taiwan and Singapore by using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), organized by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Taiwan and Singapore are identified as the only two Asian countries integrating the Chinese/Confucian tradition in their education regarding TEDS-M. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two countries, as compared to other TEDS-M higher-achieving Western countries, such as Germany, Poland, Russia, Switzerland, and the USA, are examined after reselecting and reclassifying the achievement items based on Niss' (2003) mathematics competence and Hsieh's (Secondary Education, 63(3), 2012) mathematics teaching competence structures. This study shows that Singaporean future teachers are weaker in the competence of devising formal mathematical arguments and transforming heuristic ideas into valid proofs than Taiwanese future teachers. Taiwan and Singapore demonstrate relative strengths at primary, lower-, and upper-secondary levels in mathematics competencies but show relative weaknesses at the tertiary level than do other higher-achieving Western countries. Comparing these two countries, Taiwan shows relative strengths at upper-secondary and tertiary levels, and Singaporean strengths are at primary and lower-secondary levels. This distinction is primarily because of the thought-oriented category of mathematics competencies. This study also finds that Taiwan and Singapore belong to different clusters compared with the higher-achieving Western countries regarding their future teachers' relative strengths and weaknesses in either mathematics or mathematics teaching competence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)819-846
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Taiwan
mathematics
Teaching
teacher
Singapore
Teacher Education
Mathematics Teaching
education
secondary school teacher
secondary education
Switzerland
Heuristics
Valid
Poland
heuristics
Russia
Evaluation
Demonstrate
Education
evaluation

Keywords

  • TEDS-M
  • international comparison study
  • mathematics teacher competence
  • mathematics teacher education
  • mathematics teaching competence
  • pedagogical content knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

ARE TAIWANESE AND SINGAPOREAN FUTURE TEACHERS SIMILAR IN THEIR MATHEMATICS-RELATED TEACHING COMPETENCIES? / Hsieh, Feng-Jui; Wong, Khoon Yoong; Wang, Ting Ying.

In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.08.2013, p. 819-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58b597720ee34845a5f1e8954dda025a,
title = "ARE TAIWANESE AND SINGAPOREAN FUTURE TEACHERS SIMILAR IN THEIR MATHEMATICS-RELATED TEACHING COMPETENCIES?",
abstract = "This study investigates the similarities and differences of mathematics-related teaching competencies between the future secondary school teachers of Taiwan and Singapore by using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), organized by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Taiwan and Singapore are identified as the only two Asian countries integrating the Chinese/Confucian tradition in their education regarding TEDS-M. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two countries, as compared to other TEDS-M higher-achieving Western countries, such as Germany, Poland, Russia, Switzerland, and the USA, are examined after reselecting and reclassifying the achievement items based on Niss' (2003) mathematics competence and Hsieh's (Secondary Education, 63(3), 2012) mathematics teaching competence structures. This study shows that Singaporean future teachers are weaker in the competence of devising formal mathematical arguments and transforming heuristic ideas into valid proofs than Taiwanese future teachers. Taiwan and Singapore demonstrate relative strengths at primary, lower-, and upper-secondary levels in mathematics competencies but show relative weaknesses at the tertiary level than do other higher-achieving Western countries. Comparing these two countries, Taiwan shows relative strengths at upper-secondary and tertiary levels, and Singaporean strengths are at primary and lower-secondary levels. This distinction is primarily because of the thought-oriented category of mathematics competencies. This study also finds that Taiwan and Singapore belong to different clusters compared with the higher-achieving Western countries regarding their future teachers' relative strengths and weaknesses in either mathematics or mathematics teaching competence.",
keywords = "TEDS-M, international comparison study, mathematics teacher competence, mathematics teacher education, mathematics teaching competence, pedagogical content knowledge",
author = "Feng-Jui Hsieh and Wong, {Khoon Yoong} and Wang, {Ting Ying}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10763-013-9418-8",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "819--846",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education",
issn = "1571-0068",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ARE TAIWANESE AND SINGAPOREAN FUTURE TEACHERS SIMILAR IN THEIR MATHEMATICS-RELATED TEACHING COMPETENCIES?

AU - Hsieh, Feng-Jui

AU - Wong, Khoon Yoong

AU - Wang, Ting Ying

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - This study investigates the similarities and differences of mathematics-related teaching competencies between the future secondary school teachers of Taiwan and Singapore by using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), organized by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Taiwan and Singapore are identified as the only two Asian countries integrating the Chinese/Confucian tradition in their education regarding TEDS-M. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two countries, as compared to other TEDS-M higher-achieving Western countries, such as Germany, Poland, Russia, Switzerland, and the USA, are examined after reselecting and reclassifying the achievement items based on Niss' (2003) mathematics competence and Hsieh's (Secondary Education, 63(3), 2012) mathematics teaching competence structures. This study shows that Singaporean future teachers are weaker in the competence of devising formal mathematical arguments and transforming heuristic ideas into valid proofs than Taiwanese future teachers. Taiwan and Singapore demonstrate relative strengths at primary, lower-, and upper-secondary levels in mathematics competencies but show relative weaknesses at the tertiary level than do other higher-achieving Western countries. Comparing these two countries, Taiwan shows relative strengths at upper-secondary and tertiary levels, and Singaporean strengths are at primary and lower-secondary levels. This distinction is primarily because of the thought-oriented category of mathematics competencies. This study also finds that Taiwan and Singapore belong to different clusters compared with the higher-achieving Western countries regarding their future teachers' relative strengths and weaknesses in either mathematics or mathematics teaching competence.

AB - This study investigates the similarities and differences of mathematics-related teaching competencies between the future secondary school teachers of Taiwan and Singapore by using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), organized by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Taiwan and Singapore are identified as the only two Asian countries integrating the Chinese/Confucian tradition in their education regarding TEDS-M. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two countries, as compared to other TEDS-M higher-achieving Western countries, such as Germany, Poland, Russia, Switzerland, and the USA, are examined after reselecting and reclassifying the achievement items based on Niss' (2003) mathematics competence and Hsieh's (Secondary Education, 63(3), 2012) mathematics teaching competence structures. This study shows that Singaporean future teachers are weaker in the competence of devising formal mathematical arguments and transforming heuristic ideas into valid proofs than Taiwanese future teachers. Taiwan and Singapore demonstrate relative strengths at primary, lower-, and upper-secondary levels in mathematics competencies but show relative weaknesses at the tertiary level than do other higher-achieving Western countries. Comparing these two countries, Taiwan shows relative strengths at upper-secondary and tertiary levels, and Singaporean strengths are at primary and lower-secondary levels. This distinction is primarily because of the thought-oriented category of mathematics competencies. This study also finds that Taiwan and Singapore belong to different clusters compared with the higher-achieving Western countries regarding their future teachers' relative strengths and weaknesses in either mathematics or mathematics teaching competence.

KW - TEDS-M

KW - international comparison study

KW - mathematics teacher competence

KW - mathematics teacher education

KW - mathematics teaching competence

KW - pedagogical content knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884531927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884531927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10763-013-9418-8

DO - 10.1007/s10763-013-9418-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84884531927

VL - 11

SP - 819

EP - 846

JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

SN - 1571-0068

IS - 4

ER -