Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments

Kent D. Miller, Shu Jou Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organizations interpret their environments by categorizing strategic issues as either opportunities or threats. They make such categorizations as inferences drawn from analogies from past experience. The accuracy of issue interpretations turns on: (1) which analogy is used, (2) what are the environment's properties, and (3) what is the timeframe? A computational model allows us to evaluate over time the accuracy of interpretations based on different forms of analogical reasoning in environments that differ in variation (unpredictability and dynamism) and complexity (dimensionality and ruggedness). This study elaborates a contingency approach to assessing analogical reasoning by organizations in which the form of analogical reasoning, environmental properties, and time all matter. Our findings indicate when particular forms of reasoning produce relatively more accurate inferences about opportunities and threats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2000-2020
Number of pages21
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume36
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec

Fingerprint

Strategic issues
Threat
Inference
Computational model
Contingency approach
Dynamism
Dimensionality

Keywords

  • analogy
  • computational model
  • environmental complexity
  • organizational decision making
  • strategic issue diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments. / Miller, Kent D.; Lin, Shu Jou.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 13, 12.2015, p. 2000-2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{699740a1182f4174848c0a37f8889e9e,
title = "Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments",
abstract = "Organizations interpret their environments by categorizing strategic issues as either opportunities or threats. They make such categorizations as inferences drawn from analogies from past experience. The accuracy of issue interpretations turns on: (1) which analogy is used, (2) what are the environment's properties, and (3) what is the timeframe? A computational model allows us to evaluate over time the accuracy of interpretations based on different forms of analogical reasoning in environments that differ in variation (unpredictability and dynamism) and complexity (dimensionality and ruggedness). This study elaborates a contingency approach to assessing analogical reasoning by organizations in which the form of analogical reasoning, environmental properties, and time all matter. Our findings indicate when particular forms of reasoning produce relatively more accurate inferences about opportunities and threats.",
keywords = "analogy, computational model, environmental complexity, organizational decision making, strategic issue diagnosis",
author = "Miller, {Kent D.} and Lin, {Shu Jou}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2335",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2000--2020",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments

AU - Miller, Kent D.

AU - Lin, Shu Jou

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Organizations interpret their environments by categorizing strategic issues as either opportunities or threats. They make such categorizations as inferences drawn from analogies from past experience. The accuracy of issue interpretations turns on: (1) which analogy is used, (2) what are the environment's properties, and (3) what is the timeframe? A computational model allows us to evaluate over time the accuracy of interpretations based on different forms of analogical reasoning in environments that differ in variation (unpredictability and dynamism) and complexity (dimensionality and ruggedness). This study elaborates a contingency approach to assessing analogical reasoning by organizations in which the form of analogical reasoning, environmental properties, and time all matter. Our findings indicate when particular forms of reasoning produce relatively more accurate inferences about opportunities and threats.

AB - Organizations interpret their environments by categorizing strategic issues as either opportunities or threats. They make such categorizations as inferences drawn from analogies from past experience. The accuracy of issue interpretations turns on: (1) which analogy is used, (2) what are the environment's properties, and (3) what is the timeframe? A computational model allows us to evaluate over time the accuracy of interpretations based on different forms of analogical reasoning in environments that differ in variation (unpredictability and dynamism) and complexity (dimensionality and ruggedness). This study elaborates a contingency approach to assessing analogical reasoning by organizations in which the form of analogical reasoning, environmental properties, and time all matter. Our findings indicate when particular forms of reasoning produce relatively more accurate inferences about opportunities and threats.

KW - analogy

KW - computational model

KW - environmental complexity

KW - organizational decision making

KW - strategic issue diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939858469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939858469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2335

DO - 10.1002/smj.2335

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939858469

VL - 36

SP - 2000

EP - 2020

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 13

ER -