An ideal of customization strategy for universities improving students' critical thinking

Chien Yun Dai, Duen Huang Huang*, Syuan Zih Lin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research aims to use a customization strategy for universities to increase students' critical thinking in Taiwan. In order to enhance learning effectiveness and future competiveness, the research examined seven factors which were included analysis, evaluation, integration, management, identification, communication, and access of information literacy which have connection with critical thinking. The instruments of the research were one was information literacy redesigned based on the Association of College and Research Libraries, ACRL (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, and the other was critical thinking questionnaires. After the Multiple Regression Analysis, there were relationships between information literacy and critical thinking on different department as follows. (a) The analysis and access concepts can predict the total score of critical thinking in Department of Mechanical Engineering. (b) The assumption identification and induction can predict the total score of information literacy in Department of Mechanical Engineering. (c) The deduction can predict the total score of information literacy in Department of Civil Engineering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-100
Number of pages2
JournalAdvanced Science Letters
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug

Keywords

  • Association of college and research libraries
  • Critical thinking
  • Customization strategy
  • Information literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science
  • Health(social science)
  • General Mathematics
  • Education
  • General Environmental Science
  • General Engineering
  • General Energy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ideal of customization strategy for universities improving students' critical thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this