TY - GEN
T1 - An alternative Chinese keyboard layout design for single-digit typists
AU - Chen, Ming Chung
AU - Wu, Ting Fang
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - This study designed an alternative Chinese keyboard layout for single-digit typists and evaluated the efficacy of this innovative layout design. The new eight row by five column keyboard layout was designed based on the principles of alternative keyboard design. Eight college students with proficient keyboarding were involved in this study. The repeated measurement experimental design was used to compare the speed and accuracy of keystroke among the four different keyboard patterns: QWERTY, Alternative, RevisedQWERTY, and Random-Alternative. The experimental results indicated that the subjects' typing speed is fastest when utilizing the QWERTY layout (63.86 symbols/minute), followed by the Alternative (56.02 symbols/minute), Revised QWERTY (53.39 symbols/minute) and the Random-Alternative keyboard (49.94 symbols/minute). There is no significant difference among QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative layouts on the subjects' typing accuracy. The possible causes of the unpredicted results and suggestions for further studies were discussed.
AB - This study designed an alternative Chinese keyboard layout for single-digit typists and evaluated the efficacy of this innovative layout design. The new eight row by five column keyboard layout was designed based on the principles of alternative keyboard design. Eight college students with proficient keyboarding were involved in this study. The repeated measurement experimental design was used to compare the speed and accuracy of keystroke among the four different keyboard patterns: QWERTY, Alternative, RevisedQWERTY, and Random-Alternative. The experimental results indicated that the subjects' typing speed is fastest when utilizing the QWERTY layout (63.86 symbols/minute), followed by the Alternative (56.02 symbols/minute), Revised QWERTY (53.39 symbols/minute) and the Random-Alternative keyboard (49.94 symbols/minute). There is no significant difference among QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative layouts on the subjects' typing accuracy. The possible causes of the unpredicted results and suggestions for further studies were discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748522744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748522744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/11788713_134
DO - 10.1007/11788713_134
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33748522744
SN - 3540360204
SN - 9783540360209
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 919
EP - 925
BT - Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 10th International Conference, ICCHP 2006 - Proceedings
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP 2006
Y2 - 11 July 2006 through 13 July 2006
ER -