TY - JOUR
T1 - A TOOL OF TECHNOLOGY-BASED LABORATORY ENABLED STUDENTS TO PRECISELY DESCRIBE SCIENTIFIC PHENOMENA
AU - Liu, Chia Yu
AU - Wu, Chao Jung
AU - Chiou, Guo Li
AU - Wong, Wing Kwong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Journal of Baltic Science Education. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Proposing scientific descriptions is critical for individuals to cope with daily problems and acquire essential information. Nonetheless, few classes have enhanced students’ ability to describe facts of scientific phenomena. Thus, using a tool of technology-based laboratory, this research examined whether students’ scientific descriptions and mathematical modelling behaviours could be improved. The participants included 52 undergraduate students randomly assigned to the experimental and control group. Two prompts were developed to remind the experimental group that it is common to place ‘time’ along the x-axis and that mathematical modelling is important in physics. Results showed that as expected, all participants generated more propositions in scientific descriptions, especially the experimental group. However, contrary to the hypothesis, the participants did not propose more correct propositions and the effect of group was limited. Moreover, the hypotheses were partially supported that the participants used more image-based and mathematics-based representations to describe phenomena, and the proportion of participants whose propositional type was quantitatively increased, though no main effects of group were observed. Most participants adjusted their mathematical models by keeping slightly changing the coefficients/constants to fit the data, rather than applying relevant physics knowledge to revise models, illustrating their difficulties in connecting mathematical representations with actual phenomena.
AB - Proposing scientific descriptions is critical for individuals to cope with daily problems and acquire essential information. Nonetheless, few classes have enhanced students’ ability to describe facts of scientific phenomena. Thus, using a tool of technology-based laboratory, this research examined whether students’ scientific descriptions and mathematical modelling behaviours could be improved. The participants included 52 undergraduate students randomly assigned to the experimental and control group. Two prompts were developed to remind the experimental group that it is common to place ‘time’ along the x-axis and that mathematical modelling is important in physics. Results showed that as expected, all participants generated more propositions in scientific descriptions, especially the experimental group. However, contrary to the hypothesis, the participants did not propose more correct propositions and the effect of group was limited. Moreover, the hypotheses were partially supported that the participants used more image-based and mathematics-based representations to describe phenomena, and the proportion of participants whose propositional type was quantitatively increased, though no main effects of group were observed. Most participants adjusted their mathematical models by keeping slightly changing the coefficients/constants to fit the data, rather than applying relevant physics knowledge to revise models, illustrating their difficulties in connecting mathematical representations with actual phenomena.
KW - mathematical modelling
KW - model-building behaviours
KW - modelling activities
KW - physics teaching/learning strategies
KW - technology-based laboratory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133659742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133659742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33225/jbse/22.21.495
DO - 10.33225/jbse/22.21.495
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133659742
SN - 1648-3898
VL - 21
SP - 495
EP - 512
JO - Journal of Baltic Science Education
JF - Journal of Baltic Science Education
IS - 3
ER -