A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games

Jon Chao Hong, Ming Chou Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate strategic thinking between the experts and the novices of computer games. The computer game "Klotski" was chosen for 76 elementary school students to play. The operating time and number of steps were recorded to identify the expert and novice players. Following this, five expert players and five novice players were asked to play the game again. All game play processes, using a think-aloud protocol, were videotaped for further analysis. The analysis results showed that the relationship between the operating time and the steps of the novice group were more scattered than the expert group. The significant difference between the expert and novice groups was the percentage of different thinking types. In the game playing process, the expert players used more analogical thinking while the novice players tended to use trial-and-error thinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-258
Number of pages14
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Video Games
Computer games
Students
Computer Games
Novice
Players

Keywords

  • Computer game
  • Experts
  • Novices
  • Strategic thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games. / Hong, Jon Chao; Liu, Ming Chou.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.03.2003, p. 245-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f2f9321baa6498096b0901ec47f203d,
title = "A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games",
abstract = "The purpose of this study is to investigate strategic thinking between the experts and the novices of computer games. The computer game {"}Klotski{"} was chosen for 76 elementary school students to play. The operating time and number of steps were recorded to identify the expert and novice players. Following this, five expert players and five novice players were asked to play the game again. All game play processes, using a think-aloud protocol, were videotaped for further analysis. The analysis results showed that the relationship between the operating time and the steps of the novice group were more scattered than the expert group. The significant difference between the expert and novice groups was the percentage of different thinking types. In the game playing process, the expert players used more analogical thinking while the novice players tended to use trial-and-error thinking.",
keywords = "Computer game, Experts, Novices, Strategic thinking",
author = "Hong, {Jon Chao} and Liu, {Ming Chou}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00013-4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "245--258",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games

AU - Hong, Jon Chao

AU - Liu, Ming Chou

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - The purpose of this study is to investigate strategic thinking between the experts and the novices of computer games. The computer game "Klotski" was chosen for 76 elementary school students to play. The operating time and number of steps were recorded to identify the expert and novice players. Following this, five expert players and five novice players were asked to play the game again. All game play processes, using a think-aloud protocol, were videotaped for further analysis. The analysis results showed that the relationship between the operating time and the steps of the novice group were more scattered than the expert group. The significant difference between the expert and novice groups was the percentage of different thinking types. In the game playing process, the expert players used more analogical thinking while the novice players tended to use trial-and-error thinking.

AB - The purpose of this study is to investigate strategic thinking between the experts and the novices of computer games. The computer game "Klotski" was chosen for 76 elementary school students to play. The operating time and number of steps were recorded to identify the expert and novice players. Following this, five expert players and five novice players were asked to play the game again. All game play processes, using a think-aloud protocol, were videotaped for further analysis. The analysis results showed that the relationship between the operating time and the steps of the novice group were more scattered than the expert group. The significant difference between the expert and novice groups was the percentage of different thinking types. In the game playing process, the expert players used more analogical thinking while the novice players tended to use trial-and-error thinking.

KW - Computer game

KW - Experts

KW - Novices

KW - Strategic thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037350842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037350842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00013-4

DO - 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00013-4

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 245

EP - 258

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

IS - 2

ER -