A study on the use of lexical bundles in native and nonnative English academic writing

Jia Wen Kelly Hsu, Hao-Jan Chen, Ting Yu Christine Yang, Chen Yu Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Lexical bundle studies have attracted much interest recently. Many studies have examined how nonnative speakers employ bundles in their language production but few studies have explored disciplinespecific bundles in the field of applied linguistics. This study thus aims to investigate how non-native speakers in the field of applied linguistics employ discipline-specific bundles. The data includes three corpora: a 1-million-word expert writer corpus, a 1.8-millionword nonnative-speaker (NNS) writer corpus, and a 1.8-million-word native-speaker (NS) writer corpus. Bundles identified in the corpora were categorized based on functions. Findings include: (1) Expert writers used 118 types of bundles, whereas NNS and NS writers used 197 and 115 types respectively. Yet, only 41 types were shared by all. (2) The distributions of bundle usage patterns were similar for the expert writers and the NS writers. (3) Although the NNS group used more bundle types, 121 types were not found in either the expert or NS groups. (4) The three corpora had similar functional distributions, with research-oriented bundles being the most common, followed by textoriented and participant-oriented bundles. (5) NNS writers tended to rely on certain bundles to specify research topics and results, but they didn't seem to have a good command of participant-oriented bundles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-98
Number of pages44
JournalEnglish Teaching and Learning
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jun 1

Fingerprint

writer
expert
linguistics
research results
Group
language

Keywords

  • Corpus-based analysis
  • English for Academic Purposes (EAP)
  • Lexical bundles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

A study on the use of lexical bundles in native and nonnative English academic writing. / Hsu, Jia Wen Kelly; Chen, Hao-Jan; Yang, Ting Yu Christine; Liu, Chen Yu.

In: English Teaching and Learning, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 55-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hsu, Jia Wen Kelly ; Chen, Hao-Jan ; Yang, Ting Yu Christine ; Liu, Chen Yu. / A study on the use of lexical bundles in native and nonnative English academic writing. In: English Teaching and Learning. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 55-98.
@article{930c17e78dfa4b47be60c5d84cf09362,
title = "A study on the use of lexical bundles in native and nonnative English academic writing",
abstract = "Lexical bundle studies have attracted much interest recently. Many studies have examined how nonnative speakers employ bundles in their language production but few studies have explored disciplinespecific bundles in the field of applied linguistics. This study thus aims to investigate how non-native speakers in the field of applied linguistics employ discipline-specific bundles. The data includes three corpora: a 1-million-word expert writer corpus, a 1.8-millionword nonnative-speaker (NNS) writer corpus, and a 1.8-million-word native-speaker (NS) writer corpus. Bundles identified in the corpora were categorized based on functions. Findings include: (1) Expert writers used 118 types of bundles, whereas NNS and NS writers used 197 and 115 types respectively. Yet, only 41 types were shared by all. (2) The distributions of bundle usage patterns were similar for the expert writers and the NS writers. (3) Although the NNS group used more bundle types, 121 types were not found in either the expert or NS groups. (4) The three corpora had similar functional distributions, with research-oriented bundles being the most common, followed by textoriented and participant-oriented bundles. (5) NNS writers tended to rely on certain bundles to specify research topics and results, but they didn't seem to have a good command of participant-oriented bundles.",
keywords = "Corpus-based analysis, English for Academic Purposes (EAP), Lexical bundles",
author = "Hsu, {Jia Wen Kelly} and Hao-Jan Chen and Yang, {Ting Yu Christine} and Liu, {Chen Yu}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.6330/ETL.2017.41.2.03",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "55--98",
journal = "English Teaching and Learning",
issn = "1023-7267",
publisher = "臺灣師範大學英語文教學中心 & Airiti Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study on the use of lexical bundles in native and nonnative English academic writing

AU - Hsu, Jia Wen Kelly

AU - Chen, Hao-Jan

AU - Yang, Ting Yu Christine

AU - Liu, Chen Yu

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Lexical bundle studies have attracted much interest recently. Many studies have examined how nonnative speakers employ bundles in their language production but few studies have explored disciplinespecific bundles in the field of applied linguistics. This study thus aims to investigate how non-native speakers in the field of applied linguistics employ discipline-specific bundles. The data includes three corpora: a 1-million-word expert writer corpus, a 1.8-millionword nonnative-speaker (NNS) writer corpus, and a 1.8-million-word native-speaker (NS) writer corpus. Bundles identified in the corpora were categorized based on functions. Findings include: (1) Expert writers used 118 types of bundles, whereas NNS and NS writers used 197 and 115 types respectively. Yet, only 41 types were shared by all. (2) The distributions of bundle usage patterns were similar for the expert writers and the NS writers. (3) Although the NNS group used more bundle types, 121 types were not found in either the expert or NS groups. (4) The three corpora had similar functional distributions, with research-oriented bundles being the most common, followed by textoriented and participant-oriented bundles. (5) NNS writers tended to rely on certain bundles to specify research topics and results, but they didn't seem to have a good command of participant-oriented bundles.

AB - Lexical bundle studies have attracted much interest recently. Many studies have examined how nonnative speakers employ bundles in their language production but few studies have explored disciplinespecific bundles in the field of applied linguistics. This study thus aims to investigate how non-native speakers in the field of applied linguistics employ discipline-specific bundles. The data includes three corpora: a 1-million-word expert writer corpus, a 1.8-millionword nonnative-speaker (NNS) writer corpus, and a 1.8-million-word native-speaker (NS) writer corpus. Bundles identified in the corpora were categorized based on functions. Findings include: (1) Expert writers used 118 types of bundles, whereas NNS and NS writers used 197 and 115 types respectively. Yet, only 41 types were shared by all. (2) The distributions of bundle usage patterns were similar for the expert writers and the NS writers. (3) Although the NNS group used more bundle types, 121 types were not found in either the expert or NS groups. (4) The three corpora had similar functional distributions, with research-oriented bundles being the most common, followed by textoriented and participant-oriented bundles. (5) NNS writers tended to rely on certain bundles to specify research topics and results, but they didn't seem to have a good command of participant-oriented bundles.

KW - Corpus-based analysis

KW - English for Academic Purposes (EAP)

KW - Lexical bundles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027992616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027992616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6330/ETL.2017.41.2.03

DO - 10.6330/ETL.2017.41.2.03

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 55

EP - 98

JO - English Teaching and Learning

JF - English Teaching and Learning

SN - 1023-7267

IS - 2

ER -