Abstract
In this short paper, we look into a conclusion drawn by Alzalg (J Optim Theory Appl 169:32–49, 2016). We think the conclusion drawn in the paper is incorrect by pointing out three things. First, we provide a counterexample that the proposed inner product does not satisfy bilinearity. Secondly, we offer an argument why a pth-order cone cannot be self-dual under any reasonable inner product structure on Rn. Thirdly, even under the assumption that all elements operator commute, the inner product becomes an official inner product and the arbitrary-order cone can be shown as a symmetric cone, we think this condition is still unreasonable and very stringent so that the result can only be applied to very few cases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1066-1070 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications |
Volume | 173 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 Jun 1 |
Keywords
- Inner product
- Jordan algebras
- Second-order cone
- pth-order cone
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Control and Optimization
- Applied Mathematics