足球個人攻擊技術與整體戰術分析比較:以2004年世界盃五人制足球比賽冠亞軍賽為例

Translated title of the contribution: An Analysis of Individual Attacking Skill and Team Tactics in Futsal: A Case Study of the Final of the 2004 Futsal World Cup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study analyses the skills for beating an opponent in one-on-one situations and shooting skills in Futsal, and compares the passing and control tactics of the teams involved in the final match of the 2004 Futsal World Cup held in Taipei. Analysis was achieved with the help of DVD recording. The results obtained were as follows: For the individual skills of beating an opponent and shooting, Spain and Italy showed equal success; Spain made 31 attempts at beating the opponent, succeeding 8 times; Italy made 35 attempts at beating the opponent, succeeding 10 times. It can thus be seen that the defensive abilities of Spain and Italy were quite outstanding. For shooting, Spain had 16 shots on goal, 9 of which hit the target, and resulting in 2 goals scored. Italy had 28 shots on goal, 11 of which hit the target, and resulting in 1 goal scored. Both teams enjoyed an equal amount of possession. Spain exceeded Italy, however, in passing, with a total of 455 successful passes to Italy's 333. It can thus be seen that Spain showed greater ability in passing skill and took scoring opportunities well, finally beating Italy 2:1 in the final, and winning their second consecutive World Cup.
Translated title of the contributionAn Analysis of Individual Attacking Skill and Team Tactics in Futsal: A Case Study of the Final of the 2004 Futsal World Cup
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)392-396
Number of pages5
Journal大專體育學術專刊
Issue number95年度
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • futsal
  • beating opponent
  • one-on-one
  • shooting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Analysis of Individual Attacking Skill and Team Tactics in Futsal: A Case Study of the Final of the 2004 Futsal World Cup'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this