籃球投籃型式之功能性反應及其經驗效應

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine: ⑴ Is there a standard pattern for basketball shooting? ⑵ Are there any different pattern levels existing between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? ⑶ Are there any differences in standard shooting patterns assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? And (4) Does experience affect basketball shooting patterns? Thirty female high school students (mean age=17.0±0.6yrs.) served as participants in this study, divided into 2 groups according to their experience. Each participant's task was to shoot 10times from the free-throw line and each shooting performance was videotaped. Shooting patterns were assessed using component approach. The results, after being analyzed through chi-square and t tests were as follows: ⑴ There was significant differences between goal-made and standard shooting patterns(p<.05); ⑵ In pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions no significant differences were found (p>.05; hand ES=.11, trunk ES=-.03, knee ES=0, feet ES=.07, and position ES=.03); ⑶Significant differences(p<.05)were found in standard shooting patterns except for the preparative hand(p>.05); and ⑷ Significant differences were found in pattern levels between the experienced group and the non-experienced group(p<.05; hand ES=.69, trunk ES=.46,feet ES=.39,and position ES=.72)except for the knee component (p>.05; ES=0). Thus, findings of this study were as follows: ⑴ No standard shooting pattern in basketball; ⑵ Pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were the same; ⑶ Standard shooting pattern assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were different; and ⑷ Training experience affected goal made pattern level.
Original languageChinese
Pages (from-to)61-76
Number of pages16
Journal臺灣運動心理學報
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Cite this

籃球投籃型式之功能性反應及其經驗效應. / 陳淑惠(Joy S. H. Chen); 卓俊伶(Hank J. Jwo); 梁嘉音(Carolyn C. Y. Liang).

In: 臺灣運動心理學報, No. 2, 2003, p. 61-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e487b31eef44271aa2c0393fac38ccb,
title = "籃球投籃型式之功能性反應及其經驗效應",
abstract = "The purposes of this study were to examine: ⑴ Is there a standard pattern for basketball shooting? ⑵ Are there any different pattern levels existing between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? ⑶ Are there any differences in standard shooting patterns assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? And (4) Does experience affect basketball shooting patterns? Thirty female high school students (mean age=17.0±0.6yrs.) served as participants in this study, divided into 2 groups according to their experience. Each participant's task was to shoot 10times from the free-throw line and each shooting performance was videotaped. Shooting patterns were assessed using component approach. The results, after being analyzed through chi-square and t tests were as follows: ⑴ There was significant differences between goal-made and standard shooting patterns(p<.05); ⑵ In pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions no significant differences were found (p>.05; hand ES=.11, trunk ES=-.03, knee ES=0, feet ES=.07, and position ES=.03); ⑶Significant differences(p<.05)were found in standard shooting patterns except for the preparative hand(p>.05); and ⑷ Significant differences were found in pattern levels between the experienced group and the non-experienced group(p<.05; hand ES=.69, trunk ES=.46,feet ES=.39,and position ES=.72)except for the knee component (p>.05; ES=0). Thus, findings of this study were as follows: ⑴ No standard shooting pattern in basketball; ⑵ Pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were the same; ⑶ Standard shooting pattern assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were different; and ⑷ Training experience affected goal made pattern level.",
keywords = "籃球投籃型式, 因素方法, basketball shooting patterns, component approach",
author = "陳, {淑惠(Joy S. H. Chen)} and 卓, {俊伶(Hank J. Jwo)} and 梁, {嘉音(Carolyn C. Y. Liang)}",
year = "2003",
language = "Chinese",
pages = "61--76",
journal = "臺灣運動心理學報",
issn = "1814-5108",
publisher = "臺灣運動心理學會",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 籃球投籃型式之功能性反應及其經驗效應

AU - 陳, 淑惠(Joy S. H. Chen)

AU - 卓, 俊伶(Hank J. Jwo)

AU - 梁, 嘉音(Carolyn C. Y. Liang)

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The purposes of this study were to examine: ⑴ Is there a standard pattern for basketball shooting? ⑵ Are there any different pattern levels existing between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? ⑶ Are there any differences in standard shooting patterns assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? And (4) Does experience affect basketball shooting patterns? Thirty female high school students (mean age=17.0±0.6yrs.) served as participants in this study, divided into 2 groups according to their experience. Each participant's task was to shoot 10times from the free-throw line and each shooting performance was videotaped. Shooting patterns were assessed using component approach. The results, after being analyzed through chi-square and t tests were as follows: ⑴ There was significant differences between goal-made and standard shooting patterns(p<.05); ⑵ In pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions no significant differences were found (p>.05; hand ES=.11, trunk ES=-.03, knee ES=0, feet ES=.07, and position ES=.03); ⑶Significant differences(p<.05)were found in standard shooting patterns except for the preparative hand(p>.05); and ⑷ Significant differences were found in pattern levels between the experienced group and the non-experienced group(p<.05; hand ES=.69, trunk ES=.46,feet ES=.39,and position ES=.72)except for the knee component (p>.05; ES=0). Thus, findings of this study were as follows: ⑴ No standard shooting pattern in basketball; ⑵ Pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were the same; ⑶ Standard shooting pattern assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were different; and ⑷ Training experience affected goal made pattern level.

AB - The purposes of this study were to examine: ⑴ Is there a standard pattern for basketball shooting? ⑵ Are there any different pattern levels existing between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? ⑶ Are there any differences in standard shooting patterns assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions? And (4) Does experience affect basketball shooting patterns? Thirty female high school students (mean age=17.0±0.6yrs.) served as participants in this study, divided into 2 groups according to their experience. Each participant's task was to shoot 10times from the free-throw line and each shooting performance was videotaped. Shooting patterns were assessed using component approach. The results, after being analyzed through chi-square and t tests were as follows: ⑴ There was significant differences between goal-made and standard shooting patterns(p<.05); ⑵ In pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions no significant differences were found (p>.05; hand ES=.11, trunk ES=-.03, knee ES=0, feet ES=.07, and position ES=.03); ⑶Significant differences(p<.05)were found in standard shooting patterns except for the preparative hand(p>.05); and ⑷ Significant differences were found in pattern levels between the experienced group and the non-experienced group(p<.05; hand ES=.69, trunk ES=.46,feet ES=.39,and position ES=.72)except for the knee component (p>.05; ES=0). Thus, findings of this study were as follows: ⑴ No standard shooting pattern in basketball; ⑵ Pattern levels between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were the same; ⑶ Standard shooting pattern assessment between goal-made and goal-not-made conditions were different; and ⑷ Training experience affected goal made pattern level.

KW - 籃球投籃型式

KW - 因素方法

KW - basketball shooting patterns

KW - component approach

M3 - 文章

SP - 61

EP - 76

JO - 臺灣運動心理學報

JF - 臺灣運動心理學報

SN - 1814-5108

IS - 2

ER -